What Makes Art Valuable?
In this argument I use the word valuable to mean “a considerate use, service or importance” hear I focus mainly on the social value of the arts, but it is next to impossible to keep the current climate of cultural cuts away from this issue. So I will briefly address the economic value of art for the British economy. Recent statistics show that for every £1 that is put in to the Arts, it generates £2. With the current economic and political climate since March 2011 £20,534,720 has been lost to the arts. This has generated a loss to the British economy of £41,069,440[1]. This is a colossal amount of money, and the actions of the conservatives which has generated this loss seem exceptionally short sited. ART IS VALUABLE FOR THE ECONOMY
Having now put this to the side I will move on to “outsider art”. I recently attended a talk about outsider art at the Tate Modern, the temple of “insider art”. To start with it seemed strange to host this talk in such an establishment, especially as the Tate famously rejects outsider art and questions its role within the art world. The talk started with a screening of ‘Thou Art’ a documentary film made about the role that making art has for the outsider artist. The general consensus was that outsider artists lived because of art. It was the process that gave their lives structure. One man said;
“The task of making art is what brings Chaos in to order” [2]
Another outsider artist when speaking about her art practice said
“I have something to look forward to all the time” [3]
Often outsider artists have severe emotional, behavioural or social problems which make it impossible for them to integrate fully in to society, they cannot follow the normal patterns of existence and it is vital for them to have a creative outlet for their emotions. Art for them and for those who care emotionally and physically for them is held as the most valuable thing in their lives. ART IS VALUABLE AS A MEANS OF EXPRESSION
When I asked Tracy Emin what she thought made art valuable (via the Southbank Centers ‘Text Tracy Tuesdays) she said;
“I don’t know if there is such a thing as social art. Art is a lonely thing, something from the outside, going out into the world.
I always wanted to be the kind of artist that made a difference…
But it’s only as I get older I realise that the only difference is the perception of the viewer. If you don’t understand what I am trying to say, there is no point in me doing what I do.
Art is a sad lonely world. But hopefully the beauty can make a difference.”[4]
I definitely don’t agree with Emins opinion on what the Value of art is. Essentially she says beauty is the value of art for the viewer so “Art for Arts Sake”, but for the artist the value of art is the ability to express yourself. I would argue that as viewers it gives us a chance to experience things which are out of our realm of our reality, which is why we engage with them, and the fact that they are beautiful is a bonus! However it is not necessary for art to be beautiful to be considered art any longer. ART IS VALUABLE BECUASE IT IS BEAUTIFUL.
I visited “House of Beasts” in Attingham House, a stately home owned by the National Trust in Shropshire. House of Beasts is an exhibition of Modern Art in an unusual setting. My Grandad being a keen art enthusiast and also a costumed guide at Attingham took it upon himself to engage people in conversation about the works displayed around the house and grounds. Some are splendid, beautifully engaged with the surroundings and suitably chosen to do so. Others are ill-fitting, badly chosen and on the whole rather poor art. The majority of people we spoke to seriously condemned the exhibition saying it didn’t belong in the setting, and was a disgrace. Despite these views the art prompted them to engage in conversation with us for a number of minutes. This seemed very interesting to me. Even if the viewers did not like the work, they still had an opinion about it, and it made them engage with two complete strangers even if it was to discuss art in a negative way. Hear surely is the value of art? Even if you don’t like it you can still have an opinion of it, and speak to others about this opinion. ART IS VALUABLE BECAUSE IT MAKES PEOPLE TALK.
Melanie Manchot made the work Celebration (Cyprus Street) 2009 bringing together an entire community through an interactive site specific art work. Manchot worked with the residents of Cyprus Street over a two year period culminating in a street party and a group portrait which tracks using film and photography the group coming together as a community to have their photograph taken. Through the work she questions what it means to be described as a community. She carried out extensive research in the area, visiting archives, pubs, shops, cafes and the community centre, to understand what it meant to be a modern member of an East London community and finally producing a contemporary portrait of this. Although the participants in this project had no creative input to the project, the project brought the community together and allowed them to engage with each other, and an outsider (Manchot) though this creative process. ART IS A VALUABLE WAY OF CREATING UNITY AND COMMUNITY COHESION.
[2] Thou Art (University of the Arts and SLAM)
[3] Thou Art (University of the Arts and SLAM)
[4] Tracy Emin – Text Tracy Tuesdays